Somehow, getting on for four years of dominance later (and five if you negate the odd double diffuser business of 2009), none of their haughty opponents seem any closer to working out how to stop them. And today they seemed further away then ever; Seb simply was on another level. From the point that his RB9 first turned a wheel in Friday practice the efforts of the rest for the Singapore Grand Prix of 2013 looked an exercise in futility.
Sebastian Vettel once again was on another level Photo: Octane Photography |
Once ahead Seb performed his party piece: being bang on the pace from the word go, almost like somebody flicked a switch, and thus having the race utterly at his mercy before anyone knew it. He scampered off, stretching his lead by 1.6 seconds in sectors two and three of lap 1, then by a whole additional 2.2 seconds around lap 2. This was a rout.
Behind Seb the other race, that over second place, for a long way threatened to be tepid too, as everyone ran in order. But it was given a major shake by a mid-race safety car - brought about by Daniel Ricciardo pranging a wall - which given its delicate timing split strategies broadly into two directions: either swap the tyres and seek to go to the end on that single set, or else if that's too tight stay out and pit later, probably under green. And as is usually the case in such scenarios, the two groups converged upon each other as the finish neared in an exciting fashion.
Fernando Alonso was mighty as always in the race, and finished second Photo: Octane Photography |
Kimi Raikkonen - bad back or no - did similar and also benefited from the E21's freakishly gentle touch on the Pirellis, and completed the podium. There then followed the two Mercs who as mentioned had to pit under green and therefore found themselves with plenty of time to make up and overtaking to do. As it was, they couldn't even get near Kimi before the end let alone Alonso. Fourth and fifth places in a race wherein they looked best of the rest behind Seb will be disappointing.
Mark Webber led the charge of those who were left with the task of climbing the field late on, and may have got close to Kimi but for a late mechanical failure, first slowing and eventually stopping him. Felipe Massa was next up in P6, followed home by the now gripless McLarens.
Should the focus be on the achievements of Christian Horner's Red Bull team? Photo: Octane Photography |
And, at the broadest level, surely Seb today effectively clinched drivers' crown number four too.
There are many malcontents at the extent of the Vettel-Red Bull dominance right now. And, in seeking to unravel it all, part of our scrutiny needs to be directed at the likes of Ferrari, McLaren and Mercedes, as to how with their unending resources and considerable heritage in half a decade haven't answered any of the questions put to them, how they haven't got any closer despite having much time in which to do so. But part of our resolution too needs to be respectful of what exactly Sebastian Vettel and Red Bull are doing, that somehow they've discarded all F1 orthodoxy, built from the wreckage of the abortive Ford F1 effort as mere midfield fodder, and swept the board. And, most impressive of all, kept sweeping it. Despite having won everything there it to win repeatedly so far as we can sense not the merest hint of complacency has crept in. We had just the latest galling demonstration of it today.
A fair summing-up (I would expect no less).
ReplyDeleteWhile I understand the need to question the other major teams on why
they haven't caught up, none of them have the key ingredient, do they?
One A. Newey, who understands airflow and how to harness it to his needs
better than (I would wager) anyone else on the planet. Paradoxically,
this only becomes more critical as the rules are modified year-on-year
to reduce the effect of exhaust flow on rear-end grip - none of the
other teams (bar Brawn with the double-diffuser) have ever reached
Adrian's level in this area, and without making the use of exhaust gas
completely impossible, he will always eke out just enough of an edge to
make the difference.
Seb is certainly a key part of this equation. Overall, I don't think I'd
say that he's any better than Hamilton, Alonso, or Raikkonen (thus, the
great frustration with wins he doesn't even seem to have to work very
hard for). He is, however, being provided a car that is designed very
much for his strengths, the key being his comfort level with a back end
that isn't as well-planted at turn-in as many drivers would like it to
be. He has enough confidence in how the car will behave once he gets on
the throttle (and thus provides more downforce-producing exhaust)
through the apex and off the corner that it allows him to carry more
speed into the turns, and much more off of them, than anyone else. And
so, he strides away.
The FIA knows that dominance is death for the sport in the modern era,
and they've been trying to keep it from happening again, with little to
show for the effort. The key is the exhaust, of course - where can it go
where it can't be harnessed for rear-end grip? They keep tightening the
regs, and Newey keeps finding more benefit than anyone else. They tried
to reign Red Bull in via Pirelli, and seemed to have succeeded for the
first few races of the year (how long ago does Barcelona feel?).
However, Pirelli failed to regulate the teams' use of the tires well
enough (via pressures, camber and swapping), and eventually the
construction of the 2013 tire, combined with some fairly exotic settings
on some cars, caught them out and they were forced to go back to the
more conservative 2012 construction.
This has been key to Red Bull's resurgence, as the car is fundamentally
harder on tires than many others. This shouldn't really be surprising,
given that, particularly in Seb's hands, it is designed to allow earlier
throttle application and more speed through any corner where the exhaust
gas can contribute meaningfully to downforce levels. With the early 2013
spec tire, all that extra stress was pushing things over the edge into
critical wear issues. Once the failures at Silverstone forced the more
conservative 2012 construction back into use, the problem was
effectively solved for them.
(cont'd)
As we've discussed (primarily on Twitter), I don't actually dislike Seb
ReplyDeletemost of the time (when does the petulant child act, as in Malaysia,
that's a different story). He seems a nice enough guy most of the time,
and he's clearly in the mix of the best drivers in the world right now.
But, through the ultimate 'unfair advantage' (an aerodynamicist without
peer), he's gained too much success too easily at too young an age.
It's all a bit like Mansell's championship year - I didn't begrudge Nige
finally cracking it, but it was such a shame to watch a guy who was
always such a fighter just canter off into the distance every fortnight.
When Red Bull is really on their game (as they certainly are now), all
the drama drains away and we're left with a rather clinical exercise.
I want to believe that Ferrari bringing Kimi back aboard isn't a tacit
admission that no single driver can hope to challenge Seb for the
Drivers' title, so best to get two really mature, quick guys on board to
try to grab the Constructors' instead. We all know that the public
doesn't care about the Constructors' Championship, but that's where the
money is, so it would be an understandable instinct.
Thanks very much Rick for sharing your thoughts.
DeleteI know that Adrian Newey is a genius but I've always been a little sceptical of the idea that Red Bull's success is *all* down to Newey. If nothing else, it strikes me as a bit of an easy out for the other teams. And given they've had five years of rule stability in which to learn what Red Bull's doing it astonishes me that after all that time they look no nearer, especially given some of them have massive resources etc.
As for Vettel, yes I agree that a lot of the hostility can be explained by the perception that he's had things a bit easy in his F1 success so far. I'd imagine that when the day comes that he has to overcome sub-par machinery his talent will be more obvious to people, just as it was with Schumacher in 1996 and Senna in 1993. I say this as I do believe that Vettel's a great driver.
Its all about the new tire construction and thats all im going to say.
ReplyDeleteIt seems pretty clear that the new tyre construction has helped Red Bull (which was a lot of the reason why they argued for the change), but to say it's 'all about' that is a bit over the top. Don't forget that at the point of the tyre changes after Silverstone Vettel and Red Bull still led their respective championships and comfortably.
Delete