The Sebastian Vettel/Helmut Marko axis had prevailed again, they said. Kimi Raikkonen - for a long time the apparent front-runner for the ride - had been passed over on the grounds of being too much of a potential intra-team threat to the lauded Seb. Daniel Ricciardo of the sister team Toro Rosso was being promoted instead as he is less likely to challenge Vettel's supremacy. More malleable. A rabbit for the second car.
Daniel Ricciardo and Sebastian Vettel will be a pair next year Photo: Octane Photography |
Furthermore, is Ricciardo's elevation to the Red Bull race seat really a travesty? Is it possible that part of it, perhaps a major part, is that Daniel Ricciardo has made a compelling case of his own in recent times?
Not convinced? Well here are a few considerations:
Red Bull knows things that we don't
Let's not forget that Christian Horner, and others at Red Bull, know more than we do Photo: Octane Photgraphy |
Red Bull even in addition to what I mentioned hasn't been short of opportunities to observe Ricciardo at close quarters. He's taken part in no fewer than three young drivers' tests for the senior team, most recently in July, when the troubles with the Pirellis indirectly but conveniently afforded Ricciardo a timely opportunity to impress. He's also had plenty of goes on the team's simulator.
And all the while Red Bull has shown absolutely no sense of obligation to promote from within. Scott Speed, Vitantonio Liuzzi, Christian Klien, in addition to Alguersuari and Buemi mentioned, as well as a host of drivers further down the ladder, have all been unceremoniously dumped for not coming up to scratch. Never before has Red Bull shown any willingness to give a race seat in the senior team to just anyone.
It seems reasonable to infer from this that Red Bull's seen something about Ricciardo, and something very good, that the rest of us might not have done.
Ricciardo is quick
Christian Horner was asked on Sky's F1 Show if in Ricciardo (and not Raikkonen etc) he'd selected the quickest contender for the vacant seat; his answer was 'I believe we have'. But there are reasons to think he wasn't being disingenuous. Ricciardo on raw pace looks very strong indeed.
Ricciardo impressed in a Red Bull in the recent young drivers' test Photo: Octane Photography |
In F1 there is the perennial conundrum of how much a driver is bringing to the party over and above his equipment, which is particularly cryptic when further down the order. But in addition to his test form Ricciardo has by common consent been qualifying his Toro Rosso much higher than it deserves in recent months. Prior to Spa he'd got his car into the top 10 shootout in four meetings in a row. And for the most part there was no squeaking in by the skin of his teeth: in Silverstone he started P5, Nurburgring P6 and Hungaroring P8. He can also point to starting the 2012 Bahrain race in P6 in that year's recalcitrant STR7, a lap which for much of it was actually quicker than Vettel's pole time.
Some have on the other hand sought to counter this by pointing out that he's not following these up with similarly haughty race results. But this strikes me as rather unfair, in that it's much harder to out-perform a car over the course of a whole race as opposed to doing so over a single lap, and it stands to reasons that the car will return to its level over the 300km duration (I recall a similar pattern with Webber in his Jaguar days). In that sense Ricciardo has been a victim of his own success. Indeed, this is what the man himself attributes his trend on race-day to:
'In qualifying at least in Nurburgring and Budapest I probably pulled it out, not to be cocky, we were nowhere all weekend and in qualifying I managed to find a bit extra. So in the race it's hard, because we never had that pace it’s hard to keep the one-lap performance over 70 laps when you've got tyre deg and the rest. I think that we out-qualified the car…and unless you get lucky in the race it's hard to really convert that.'
While his team mate Jean-Eric Vergne has instead tended to move forward in races, that equally stands to reason as he tends to qualify below the car's potential. And remember that where Vergne tends to qualify he has much more flexibility on set-up and on the tyre compound to start on, as well as has more fresh tyres for the race.
Ricciardo has shown great pace in the Toro Rosso Photo: Octane Photography |
Red Bull probably looked at Ricciardo as someone who on the days that Vettel takes pole can qualify on the front row alongside him, and who can keep him more than honest on pace from their opening race weekend as team mates. This, more than anything else, will have sold Ricciardo to Red Bull.
Red Bull's playing the long game
Red Bull could be looking ahead. Sebastian Vettel's contract with the team runs out at the end of 2015, and rumours of him moving on at that point, possibly to Ferrari, refuse to die. By then Raikkonen will be 36 years of age; certainly in the autumn of his career, possibly looking to retire. Red Bull therefore could be in the rather unwanted position of having to replace both of its drivers at the same time.
This way the team has more of an opportunity to have a gentle transition if Vettel does move on. Ricciardo would have two years to demonstrate that he's capable either of stepping into Vettel's shoes as team leader or as being retained as a capable wing man. Over to him.
Starting from a false premise
Furthermore I am of the view that, both generally and in this specific case, some people get way too bogged down on this number one/number two driver point. Yes, Sebastian Vettel's status within the Red Bull team cannot be denied (and it stands to reason given what he's achieved there), but Horner isn't being giving us a bum steer when it says that Ricciardo will get 'identical opportunity and equipment' as Vettel in order to prove himself. The days of the 'number two' in F1 getting conspicuously worse or older spec equipment with markedly worse reliability and preparation than the 'number one' on a race-by-race basis are by now long in the sport's past. Certainly so in a team as well-resourced as Red Bull. Ricciardo couldn't ask for a better chance to show what he can do, and do it against the yardstick of one of the very best in Vettel.
Incremental benefits
Ricciardo has a wonderful opportunity to impress, no wonder he's smiling Photo: Octane Photography |
It wouldn't have helped Kimi's cause that he maintains a notorious disdain for PR. Virtually any F1 team would consider this a drawback (although Lotus seems more willing than most to tolerate this trait), but perhaps Red Bull would especially acutely, given that without wishing to sound pejorative Red Bull is in F1 as part of its marketing activities (and as Straw also noted the company wasn't too thrilled with Kimi on this front when it sponsored him in his rallying sojourn). Daniel Ricciardo by contrast seems entirely in keeping with the Red Bull brand, and equally it's hard to see him kicking up a fuss when asked to partake in such activities.
And while, as intimated, Red Bull clearly doesn't consider being a Toro Rosso driver as being deserving in itself of receiving a free pass to Red Bull, and while also I don't believe this was as crucial a consideration as some have suggested, that Ricciardo's promotion offered an opportunity for Red Bull to justify its young drivers' programme as well as the role of Toro Rosso (as well as the tens of millions it has spent on each) will not have harmed the Australian's case. In any sport, growing your own brings a certain kudos.
Red Bull may not be getting the benefit of the doubt in a general sense at the moment, as I said. But in the case of who drives for the team next year I reckon that the team has made its decision primarily for the right reasons. The more you look, the more you realise that - far from being the travesty that some are suggesting - there is a compelling case to give Daniel Ricciardo the Red Bull keys.
No comments:
Post a Comment