Should Bernie, and F1, have a more professional approach? Photo: Octane Photography |
If that's really the case, will Ferrari face a similar snub in the upcoming 2016 Russian Grand Prix? While Ferrari hasn't refused to supply engines to Red Bull Racing, they've reportedly offered their 2015-spec engines for use in 2016. While Ferrari's reasons seem obvious, it would be imperative to state here that it is Formula 1 that needs Red Bull Racing and not Ferrari. (Read: Help, Red Bull Needs Energy)
But this post isn't about Red Bull Racing's search for energy for their cars for next season. It is about how a former second hand car dealer and team owner who is now the CEO of the sport is holding teams and fans to ransom. The irony is that the world's largest (and most known) car manufacturers are being played upon by a man who has no standing otherwise in the global automotive industry. (Read: Is MotoGP Really Better Than F1?)
At the upcoming Russian Grand Prix, there's a chance that four teams could face a blackout. Mercedes and Ferrari - for not assisting Ecclestone to keep Red Bull in the sport and Force India and Sauber for lodging a complaint with the European Union against Formula 1's rule-making and revenue-sharing mechanisms. With nearly 8 out of 20 cars facing a possible black out, one won't be surprised if Vladmir Putin gets extended TV coverage! (Read: Russ-yawn Grand Prix)
On a more serious note, if Formula 1 is expecting newer investments in the form of sponsors, partners and manufacturers, the sport can't be run on whims and fancies - it needs to have a far more professional approach; one that doesn't hold the two most important stakeholders - the teams and fans - to ransom, ever.
This article was originally published on Kunal's F1 Blog and has been reproduced with permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment